|
|
|
Health systems performance rank
| Definition | Rank from 1 to end given to each country according to summary comparison of health systems performance and attainment of health systems goals. Note that the methodology for this assessment is highly controversial and is being reviewed prior to reassessment. |
| Reference | World Health Organisation. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2000. |
| Ref. URL | http://www.who.int/health-systems-performance/whr2000.htm |
| Keywords | |
Indicator Type: -> Health Services [Related Resources]
| EC | FS | GP | KZN | LP | MP | NC | NW | WC | ZA |
| Health systems performance rank [Definition] |
| 1997 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | [1] 175 |
|---|
| EC: Eastern Cape FS: Free State GP: Gauteng KZN: KwaZulu-Natal LP: Limpopo MP: Mpumalanga NC: Northern Cape NW: North West WC: Western Cape ZA: South Africa |
Notes and References
- World Health Report 2000: World Health Organisation. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2000. http://www.who.int/health-systems-performance/whr2000.htm As at January 2002, how to proceed with subsequent inter-country comparisons of health systems performance is still being debated by the World Health Organisation. Report of the working group was submitted to the WHO Executive Board - see
http://www.who.int/gb/EB_WHA/PDF/EB109/eeb1096.pdf
Local copy: -
|