![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
The Voice of the People
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DISEASE | % |
| Cancer | 42 |
| HIV/AIDS | 27 |
| Heart attack/stroke | 15 |
| Tuberculosis | 3 |
| Malaria | 2 |
| SARS | 1 |
| Other | 8 |
| Don't know/not answered | 4 |
COUNTRIES THAT REGARD HIV/AIDS AS THE MOST IMPORTANT DISEASE

With the five African countries, two thirds believe that HIV/Aids is the most
important disease. It is notable that the most important disease overall for
global citizens (cancer) is mentioned by only 1 % in this region. Africa was
also the region where most people mentioned the Millennium Goal of combating
HIV/Aids as the most important for the world as a whole. In Africa, women and
young people are generally even more concerned than other groups.
Malaria is the second most frequently mentioned disease in Africa and is of particular concern for Nigerians (35 %) and the people of Cameroon (31 %).
1For the purposes of this project, Egypt, although geographically part of Africa, is included in the 'Middle East' together with Turkey and Israel.
Focus on South Africa
The facts regarding HIV/Aids in South Africa paint a rather bleak picture, namely at the end of 2004 about 6 million South Africans are HIV-positive, about 80% of people who are HIV positive do not know their HIV status, about 500 000 are living with full-blown AIDS, and about 380000 people died this year due to AIDS-related diseases. The picture for the future looks even bleaker, namely it is being expected that during 2010 there will be about 900000 people with full-blown AIDS and about 600000 AIDS-related deaths during 2010. The cumulative impact of HIV/AIDS will be very serious, namely it is being expected that by 2011 there would have been more than 5 million AIDS-related deaths, and by 2021 there would have been more than 9 million AIDS-related deaths.
In light of the mounting demographic impact of HIV/Aids effective government intervention to address this disease is of paramount importance. The issue of the South African Government's handling of HIV/Aids is usually met with mixed responses - from criticism from some groups of activists to proponents of 'alternative ways' of handling the disease in this country. Therefore the perception of the Government's handling of HIV/Aids is included as one of the policy areas in which the views of the general public are tested every six months as part of Markinor's Government Performance Barometer. Currently, almost two thirds of adult South Africans are of the opinion that our Government is addressing the issue of HIV/Aids 'very well' or 'fairly well', despite our enormously high infection rates.
Contributing to the increased proportion of adult South Africans who approved of the Government's handling of this issue, could be Finance Minister Trevor Manuel's announcement as part of the budget speech that Government plans to spend R12.3 billion on the pandemic over the next three years, together with the public announcement of the provision of free AIDS drugs by the Gauteng Provincial Government, the first ANC-led province to do so.
ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM OF HIV/AIDS: GOVERNMENT IS HANDLING THE ISSUE VERY WELL OR FAIRLY WELL

South Africans are broadly aware of the link between HIV/Aids and risky sexual
behaviour and are generally knowledgeable about methods of protection. Yet only
30% of the sexually active male population claim to use condoms every time they
have sexual relations, with an additional 16 per cent saying they use them
most times. Nearly half (46%) assert they use them only
sometimes or never. An institutional problem in this
regard is that people who want access to condoms, do not have it because of the
unavailability or intermittent availability of condoms at primary health
facilities. It should also be said in this regard that the broad-based access of
people to primary, voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) facilities and AIDS
drugs in the light of the HIV/AIDS epidemic is still limited. Taking into
account the large number of people infected with and affected by HIV/AIDS in
South Africa, this could have potentially disastrous health, demographic and
economic consequences.
HIV/AIDS will impact on many aspects of the economic lives of South Africans, South African firms and the national economy. Reduced growth could fuel a vicious circle:
| 2002 (%) | 2003 (%) | 2004 (%) | |
| Low risk group 1: High knowledge, few sexual partners | 19 | 12 | 16 |
| Low risk group 2: Low promiscuity as protection | 21 | 23 | 18 |
| Low risk group 3:Condoms and low promiscuity | 23 | 21 | 23 |
| Medium risk group: High promiscuity, usually use condoms | 15 | 18 | 23 |
| High risk group: Ignorant behaviour | 22 | 26 | 20 |
These findings are based on interviews with 3 500 randomly chosen adult South Africans (16 years and older), representative of the demographic and geographic distribution in the country. Results were weighted and projected to the universe.
The existence of identifiable behaviour groups that show stability of findings over time, has serious consequences for the handling of these groups, the messages distributed to them by the media and even for their handling by NGOs and other organisations working in the field of HIV/Aids.
Should further information be required, the following researchers can be
contacted:
Prof Carel van Aardt (Professor and Population Economist, Bureau of Market
Research, Unisa) at telephone number 012-429 2940, fax: 012-429 3170,
cellphone: 076 141 8056 or e-mail: vaardcj@unisa.ac.za.
Ms Mari Harris (Director and Political Analyst, Markinor (Pty) Ltd) at
telephone number 011-686 8400, fax: 011-789 3764, cellphone 082 380 3010 or
e-mail: marih@markinor.co.za. (
Source: Bizcommunity, http://www.biz-community.com)
| Keywords | This Item is associated with the Following Keywords: HIV/AIDS. |
| You Can
Comment on this Item, or
View other people's Comments |
|
|
|
Related Health Statistics |
|
|
|
|
Related links |
|
|
|
|
Related Content |
|
|
| Contact details Terms of use Funder info |