At a recent meeting of the Interim Medical and Dental Council on 22 and 23 July 1996, the
Council approved a proposal to introduce a system of additional postgraduate vocational
training for medical practitioners as of 1 January 1998. This decision has created
controversy among medical students and junior doctors who do not feel that they were
consulted.
The National Progressive Primary Health Care Network (NPPHCN) would like to thank the
National Assembly Portfolio Committee on Health for the opportunity to share its views on
this important issue. NPPHCN is a national non-government organisation founded in 1987 to
advocate for the implementation of a national health system based on the principles of the
Primary Health Care (PHC) approach. NPPHCN has a membership of more than 1,100 health and
development programmes, projects, and individuals. We have offices in eight of the nine
provinces and our national office is based in Johannesburg.
Chapter two of the New Constitution contains the Bill of Rights, the most fundamental
rights of citizens by which all levels of government and other individuals are sometimes
bound. The "Bill of Rights is the cornerstone of democracy in South Africa. It
enshrines the rights of all people in our country and affirms the democratic values of
human dignity; equality and freedom. The state must respect, protect, promote, and fulfil
the rights in the Bill of Rights."
Specific health care rights also have been included. "Every person has the right to have access to:
(b) sufficient food and clean water; and
(c) a social security system including, if they are unable to support themselves and
their dependants, appropriate social assistance."
Further, "the state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within
its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of each of these
rights." This places the burden on the government to take measures to provide health
care services, food, water, and social security to all South Africans. Finally, no one may
be refused emergency medical treatment. The Constitution must be the benchmark against
which all health policies, regulations, and legislation are measured.
3.1 Greater Clarity on the Proposal
Based on recent media reports, it is not clear whether this proposal originates from
the Interim South African Medical and Dental Council (SAMDC) or the Department of Health.
The two years of additional vocational training endorsed by the SAMDC appears to be
similar to the mandatory two-year community service proposal contained in the Department
of Health's official policy document released in January 1996. Department of Health
officials have denied that the proposals are similar and insisted that this proposal
reflects the views of the SAMDC. SAMDC spokespersons have not been clear on this point in
the media. Community service and additional vocational training are two different
endeavours with very different implications that must be considered separately.
The similarity of the two proposals is potentially troubling because it calls into
question the autonomy and independence of the SAMDC. The Council was established as an
independent body by an Act of Parliament and is not directly accountable to the Minister
or Department of Health. NPPHCN urges the SAMDC to provide clarity on the origin of and
the motivation for this proposal. Given the confusion surrounding this issue, the role and
functions of the SAMDC and its relationship to the Department of Health may need to be
further clarified by the Portfolio Committee in the future.
3.2 Additional Vocational Training
The proposed new National Health System presents a major challenge to medical educators to better prepare young doctors to work in primary health care settings. While it is true that South African medical graduates receive many offers to practice internationally in the United States, Canada, and Great Britain, which reflect the quality of their education and training, they may not be properly equipped for the transformed health system where the emphasis will change from hospital care to primary care. NPPHCN agrees with the Council's findings that additional training conducted outside the hospital setting may be necessary to supplement current training and to address any deficiencies.
It is not clear, however, that simply adding two years of additional training without
broader medical curriculum reform is the best long-term solution for the nation. More
research is urgently needed to identify the specific skills medical graduates are lacking
and the shortcomings of the current medical education system. NPPHCN supports a
comprehensive approach to medical education and training reforms. This comprehensive
approach also would include a reexamination of the selection process and criteria for
admission to medical schools to redress the imbalances of the past. We are concerned about
simply adding vocational training without broader medical educational reforms.
The SAMDC said that it was discussing similar vocational training with other health
professions. It is not clear how these discussions are progressing. NPPHCN supports and
encourages these discussions. Similarly, NPPHCN recommends that additional training for
other health professionals takes place within the context of broader health professions
education reforms.
To properly prepare young doctors for the new health system and broader changes in the
country, some of the additional training should be conducted in underserved urban and
rural areas. To accommodate this proposal, sufficient senior doctors would need to be
redeployed to supervise them. We recognise that the limited number of accredited
facilities currently will limit the geographic scope of these practitioners, and suggest
that more information on the geographic location of accrediting training facilities is
needed to address this issue in the future.
Currently, the Department of Health is engaged in many activities and initiatives
addressing the need for changes in health curricula. NPPHCN supports these changes and
hopes that they will inform the deliberations of the SAMDC. As medical education reforms
will take a long time to fully implement, preparation for these changes should begin as
soon as possible and initiatives should be implemented as soon as consensus is reached..
3.3 Community Service
Although the SAMDC and the Department have stated that this proposal primarily
addresses vocational training, NPPHCN reasserts its support for mandatory community
service for doctors. We believe that as these students receive significant state subsidies
for their education, medical graduates have a responsibility to the people of this country
to provide health services in underserved areas.
Again, NPPHCN agrees with the Department of Health's policy calling for mandatary
community service to be implemented for all graduates whose education is substantially
subsidised by the government. We recognise that this policy must be discussed within the
context of the new National Qualifications Framework and addressed by the South African
Qualifications Authority (SAQA). We also recognise that it is very ambitious and will take
some time to fully implement, but we believe that it is important to redress the
imbalances of the past.
Although NPPHCN believes that community service proposals should be structured so that
the majority students choose to perform service, students should be given the option to
buy out of their service. Further, a reasonable salary and benefits should be paid to
those professionals while they are doing community service.
3.4 Prerequisites for Both Proposals
NPPHCN reiterates the need for adequate supervision and training facilities approved by the Council for those purposes. Additional vocational training should not be an opportunity for young doctors to practice on poor, marginalised people before they begin working to the private sector. Thus, adequate control and supervision are necessary to ensure a high quality of care.
There is a potential danger that doctors could emigrate rather than face additional
training or community service. This danger needs to be fully explored and addressed in
future legislation. For example, provisional medical degrees could be awarded until either
training or community service has been completed. Additionally, changing the selection
criteria of entering medical students to more closely reflect the population should help
to address this issue.
NPPHCN wants to express its concern about the lack of community input on this issue
compared to the many submissions made to the Committee yesterday on the dispensing of
medicines. NPPHCN, therefore, encourages the SAMDC to consult widely with all of the major
stakeholders, including poor communities, as they flesh out this proposal and draft
legislation for introduction in Parliament next year. Additionally, we expect that the
National Assembly Portfolio Committee on Health will closely monitor the development of
this proposal to ensure that it has broad-based support by the time that legislation is
introduced.
1. The SAMDC should provide clarity on this proposal and explain how it relates to
broader changes in health professions education contemplated by the Department.
2. As the proposal is developed, the SAMDC should provide analysis of the impact of this proposal on underserved urban and rural communities.
3. Throughout this process, the SAMDC should conduct appropriate public consultations with all of the relevant stakeholders on this issue, in particular poor communities.
![]() |
Last updated: 02/02/00
Please send comments or suggestions about
this site.